Electron Spin Echo Envelope Modulation of Spin-Polarized Photoexcited Triplet States: Application to Y3N@C80
https://doi.org/10.26907/mrsej-26202
Abstract
Electron spin echo envelope modulation (ESEEM) spectroscopy provides detailed information on electron-nuclear hyperfine interactions and has also been successfully applied to photoexcited triplet states. However, the interpretation of two-dimensional (2D) field-swept ESEEM patterns in disordered triplet systems remains challenging. In this study, we provide analytical and numerical descriptions of ESEEM in photoexcited triplet states (S = 1) within the high-field regime. We derive analytical expressions for the nuclear modulation frequencies and depths associated with individual electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) transitions at specific resonance positions where the external magnetic field aligns with the principal axes of the ZFS tensor. At these positions, the ESEEM response simplifies and exhibits characteristic differences between the two allowed EPR transition branches, providing direct access to the sign of the ZFS parameter D and to the orientation of the hyperfine coupling tensor. Numerical simulations of 2D ESEEM spectra confirm the analytical predictions and demonstrate pronounced intensity asymmetries that depend on these parameters. The developed approach is applied to the analysis of 2D ESEEM experimental data for the photoexcited triplet state of the endohedral fullerene Y3N@C80, providing a consistent interpretation of hyperfine interactions involving both 89Y and 13C nuclei. The results establish 2D ESEEM as a powerful method for the characterization of photoexcited triplet states in polycrystalline samples.
About the Authors
Yu. E. KandrashkinRussian Federation
Kazan 420029
R. B. Zaripov
Russian Federation
Kazan 420029
References
1. Teki Y., Chemistry – A European Journal 26, 980 (2020).
2. Gibbons D. J., Farawar A., Mazzella P., Leroy-Lhez S., Williams R. M., Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences 19, 136 (2020).
3. Quintes T., Mayländer M., Richert S., Nature Reviews Chemistry 7, 75 (2023).
4. Bassan E., Gualandi A., Cozzi P. G., Ceroni P., Chemical Science 12, 6607 (2021).
5. Zhang X., Wang Z., Hou Y., Yan Y., Zhao J., Dick B., Journal of Materials Chemistry C 9, 11944 (2021).
6. Wasielewski M. R., Forbes M. D., Frank N. L., Kowalski K., Scholes G. D., Yuen-Zhou J., Baldo M. A., Freedman D. E., Goldsmith R. H., Goodson T., Kirk M. L., McCusker J. K., Ogilvie J. P., Shultz D. A., Stoll S., Whaley B. K., Nature Reviews Chemistry 4, 9 (2020).
7. Santanni F., Privitera A., Advanced Optical Materials 12, 2303036 (2024).
8. Verma N. C., Fessenden R. W., The Journal of Chemical Physics 65, 2139 (1976).
9. Weber S., eMagRes 6, 255 (2017).
10. Filidou V., Mamone S., Simmons S., Karlen S. D., Anderson H. L., Kay C. W. M., Bagno A., Rastrelli F., Murata Y., Komatsu K., Lei X., Li Y., Turro N. J., Levitt M. H., Morton J. J. L., Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 371, 20120475 (2013).
11. Tait C. E., Neuhaus P., Anderson H. L., Timmel C. R., Journal of the American Chemical Society 137, 6670 (2015).
12. Tait C. E., Neuhaus P., Anderson H. L., Timmel C. R., Carbonera D., Di Valentin M., Applied Magnetic Resonance 46, 389 (2015).
13. Richert S., Tait C. E., Timmel C. R., Journal of Magnetic Resonance 280, 103 (2017), special Issue on Methodological advances in EPR spectroscopy and imaging.
14. Mims W., Physical Review B 5, 2409 (1972).
15. Dikanov S., Shubin A., Parmon V., Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969) 42, 474 (1981).
16. Stoll S., Calle C., Mitrikas G., Schweiger A., Journal of Magnetic Resonance 177, 93 (2005).
17. Salikhov K. M., Semenov A., Tsvetkov Y., Electron Spin Echo and Its Application (Nauka, 1976) [In Russian].
18. Dikanov S. A., Tsvetkov Y., Electron Spin Echo Envelope Modulation (ESEEM) Spectroscopy (CRC Press, 1992).
19. Likerov R., Tarasov V., Sukhanov A., Shestakov A., Eremina R., Zavartsev Y., Kutovoi S., Magnetic Resonance in Solids 22, 1 (2020).
20. Borovykh I., Dzuba S., Proskuryakov I., Gast P., Hoff A., Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics 1363, 182 (1998).
21. De Groot A., Evelo R., Hoff A. J., De Beer R., Scheer H., Chemical Physics Letters 118, 48 (1985).
22. Sloop D., Yu H.-L., Lin T.-S., Weissman S., Journal of Chemical Physics 75, 3746 (1981).
23. Yu H.-L., Sloop D., Weissman S., Lin T.-S., Norris J., Bowman M., The Journal of Physical Chemistry 86, 4287 (1982).
24. Lin T.-S., Chemical Review 84, 1 (1982).
25. Di Valentin M., Kay C., Giacometti G., Möbius K., Chemical Physics Letters 248, 434 (1996).
26. Doubinskii A., Lebedev Y., Salikhov K., Möbius K., Applied Magnetic Resonance 13, 459 (1997).
27. Uvarov M., Kulik L., Bizin M., Ivanova V., Zaripov R., Dzuba S., Magnetic Resonance in Solids 18, 15 (2006).
28. Maryasov A. G., Bowman M., Tsvetkov Y., Applied Magnetic Resonance 23, 211 (2002).
29. Kandrashkin Y. E., Zavartsev Y. D., Koutovoi S. A., Sukhanov A. A., Applied Magnetic Resonance 49, 1313 (2018).
30. Weil J. A., Anderson J. H., The Journal of Chemical Physics 35, 1410 (1961).
31. Schweiger A., Jeschke G., Principles of Pulse Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (Oxford University Press, 2001).
32. Zalibera M., Krylov D. S., Karagiannis D., Will P.-A., Ziegs F., Schiemenz S., Lubitz W., Reineke S., Savitsky A., Popov A. A., Angewandte Chemie 130, 283 (2018).
33. Kandrashkin Y. E., Journal of Magnetic Resonance 365, 107732 (2024).
34. Kandrashkin Y. E., Journal of Magnetic Resonance 365, 107731 (2024).
35. Maryasov A., Bowman M., Tsvetkov Y., Applied Magnetic Resonance 30, 683 (2006).
Review
For citations:
Kandrashkin Yu.E., Zaripov R.B. Electron Spin Echo Envelope Modulation of Spin-Polarized Photoexcited Triplet States: Application to Y3N@C80. Magnetic Resonance in Solids. 2026;28(2):26202 (22 pp.). https://doi.org/10.26907/mrsej-26202
JATS XML























